Recently I was introduced to the idea of a flipped classroom. The idea is an expansion of what I have been doing by limiting my lecturing and increasing the amount of time students spend working problems in class. The flipped classroom involves taking the teacher's instruction out of the classroom and placing it online outside of the classroom. Then classroom time is spent with students asking questions, working on problems, and would allow for expanded exploration. [Here is a nice presentation about what a flipped classroom is.]
So, how could this be used in the developmental math classes?
The first thing is to get "buy in" from the students. Some students may be resistant because they are used to the teacher telling them what to do (or what has been called the '"sage on the stage" model of education). Getting students who have signed up for an on campus class may be resistant to having to spend time online. Since I am already assigning online and paper homework I am used to this resistance. One thing that I have started doing is helping students individually getting signed in, and when possible having the class in the computer lab room.
Making sure that students are accessing the material could be difficult. There are always students who will not participate no matter how you 'incentivize' it. The main thing, as I see it, is starting the class with a warm up that comes straight from the online preparation material. Also, it is important to make the material entertaining and informative. Just throwing up worksheets is not going to work. The instructors that I have talked to that use this techniques record lectures, and I will need work on how to do it with online whiteboard software. Also, breaking up the lecture into smaller parts is recommended so that students can go back over the parts that they need to without having to go through the whole lecture.
The really exciting part of this, for me, is being able to expand what happens in the classroom. This has been where I have always struggled. There are so many interesting things that I wanted to do but had never figured out how to fit in. By answering student's questions at the beginning of class, there will be more time for collaborative projects during class. I have shown examples of arithmetic of worksheets in the prior two blogs. Another thing that would be great is having students develop FOIL and from that Special Products in introductory Algebra classes. There are so many resources out there, and being able to take those and expanding them for adult students will present new challenges.
I would love feedback from those who have already started using this methodology, and to discuss any concerns that people have.
Insights from a quarter of a century of teaching Developmental Mathematics to college students.
Monday, March 20, 2017
Tuesday, March 14, 2017
Calculators in Developmental Math??!!??
I continue to ponder the issue that I raised in my
last post, how do we deal with calculators and other technology in the
classroom? My first response is still the one drummed into me from my earliest
days teaching developmental class; maybe in later classes but not now. But,
again, does this really make sense?
In talking with other instructors it was pointed out
that these days we are all carrying around powerful computers in our pockets.
By not allowing students to use them we are denying the present reality, and
missing an opportunity to expand what we are teaching in the developmental
classes.
In the previous post I discussed helping our students
develop their mathematical thinking using arithmetic. In the example that I
gave in my last post:
*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*
9 + 1 = _____
9 + 3 = _____
__ + __ = ____
What pattern do you see?
Can you come up with another equation that fits this pattern?
Can you justify, that is show, that your equation is the correct answer?
*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*
What is lost by allowing students to use their
calculators for the first few problems before asking them to extrapolate and
justify their answer? The only change that I would make if using calculators
would be to instruct students to do their justification without using the
calculator.
Moving past Basic Math Skills, there are usually two
or three other developmental classes, Pre-Algebra and a pre-collegiate Algebra
course (or courses). Here the ban on calculators makes even less sense. The
arithmetic in these courses is incidental to learning the material in these courses.
One argument that I have heard, and often used myself,
is that students need to learn how to manipulate rational numbers (fractions)
by hand, so that when the get to rational expressions (algebra fractions) they
know what to do. The same method of pattern recognition I showed above could be
used, while still allowing students access to their calculators.
*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*
Find the Lowest Common Multiple (LCM) of the following groups of fractions. Remember that the LCM is the smallest number that the original numbers divide (go into).
3, 2 LCM =
3, 9 LCM =
6, 9 LCM =
12, 18 LCM =
Explain how you found each of the LCM’s above.
Do you see any patterns or procedures to do other LCM problems?
Use the above arithmetic problems to guide you in finding the LCM’s for the following groups of algebraic expressions.
x, x + 1 LCM =
x, 3x LCM =
(x + 1)(x - 2), (x + 1)(x - 1) LCM =
x(x - 3), x(x +2) LCM =
What pattern(s) do you see?
What is the correlation between the arithmetic problems and the algebra problems
Come up three problems using rational expressions explaining how you are using the pattern(s)
that you found.
*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*
Again, allowing the
students to use calculators for the arithmetic will detract nothing from the
learning experience. In fact it may actually help student comprehension because
rather than concentrating on how much they hate fractions, they can concentrate
on what we really want them to pay attention to, learning how expand what they
already know.
I am sure that, up to now
my resistance to using calculators is the age old problem of, “I didn’t learn
it that way and I made it through.” This is true, but I also never had to use
an abacus or a slide rule like previous generations did. Would making me use
those tools have made me a better mathematician? No, the tools of the past have
been replaced by the tools we have now, and we need to learn how to adapt.
Just recently I had with Dr. Michael Gigliardo of California
Lutheran University. He has started using a 3D printer to be able to have
models of the shapes that you are trying to find the volume of in Calculus III.
These can be very difficult to visualize when you try to graph them on paper. I
recounted to him how my ex-husband would try to carve the shapes out of balsam
wood, and how his method was clearly superior. He told me that they were able
to take a shape and determine the equations that would
generate it.
This ability to expand
what is being done while covering the requisite material is what we are
depriving our developmental students of. By using the increasing power of
technology we can deepen our student’s understanding.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
-
There is a great deal of back and forth about whether or not there is such a thing as a "Math Brain." Just Googling the phrase ...
-
When I started working on my summer course late last week I found myself struggling with how I am going to implement the innovative techniqu...
-
This has been a busy summer. On June 15th I was offered a full time position at Yakima Valley College. The call came two days after the Sky...